Sorry, I refuse to subcribe to read an article.
The problem Noonan fails to understand is there is no, & I do mean no admissible evidence that implicates Trump in anything.
There's hearsay, double hearsay, triple hearsay, opinions, surmises, guesses etc., etc.
I literally mean no admissible evidence under either the Federal rules or Common Law. The only admissible evidence exonerates Trump.
(you can point out any testimony you like and I will explain why it's inadmissible, irrelevant or immaterial)
Assuming, purely for the sake of argument, that Whatever the Dems think Trump did is true (and their theories are numerous) there's no crime anyone can identify, much less a high crime as identified by Blackstone.